Category: Tech

NVIDIA Unveils RTX 3000 GPU Series

It’s been two years since NVIDIA redesigned its range of high-end graphics cards from the GeForce GTX to the RTX with the 2000 card family. Today, we have the new generation of desktop GPU, the RTX 3000 series, starting with the most popular ranges: RTX 3070 and 3080. There is also the RTX 3090, for those whose PC cases and budgets know no limits.

These three maps share the NVIDIA Ampere GPU architecture, which the company says can deliver “up to” twice as much performance and 1.9 times more energy efficiency than the 2000 series at the same levels.

The RTX 3070 has 5,888 CUDA cores with a 1.5 GHz base clock, increasing to 1.73 GHz. It is equipped with 8GB of GDDR6 RAM, requires 220 watts of power from an 8-pin rail and its 2-rail body is 242 mm long. According to NVIDIA, it is 60% faster than the rtX 2070 of the previous generation, for the same price of $500. It will be available in October.

The RTX 3080, NVIDIA’s flagship product, features 8,704 CUDA cores and 10GB of GDDR6 memory with a faster 320-bit memory interface. The card is longer, 285 mm, and requires 320 watts provided by two 8-pin rails. According to NVIDIA, it is twice as powerful as the RTX 2080, sold for $700. It will go on sale on September 17.

If money isn’t a problem, then the RTX 3090 is the absolutely awesome mega-card of your dreams. It uses 10,496 CUDA cores, 24GB of 384-bit video memory, offering 8K resolution to those whose monitor or TV can support it. You’ll need 350 watts of power for 8-pin double rails for the GPU alone, three PCI slots in your case, and $1,500. According to NVIDIA, the RTX 3090 is 50% faster than the Titan RTX, and will be released on September 24.

Design advantages

In addition to raw computing power, NVIDIA is promoting new design features that allow for better performance for ray tracing graphics, streaming to services like Twitch, better compatibility with NVIDIA’s DLSS graphic boosting technology, and more efficient and efficient cooling equipment. Purchasing a new 3000 Series card will give you a free copy of the future Watch Dogs: Legion, as well as one year of Premium GeForce NOW service.

If these prices make you crack, wait a little. NVIDIA is no doubt looking forward to releasing an RTX 3060 at a more affordable price, not to mention competition from graphics card licensees such as ASUS, EVGA and Gigabyte. We should see a greater variety of designs and prices at the end of this year or early next year.…

VPN vs. Proxy, Which One Is The Better?

Proxy and VPN servers both work towards protecting the identities of the users. They are user-friendly tools when it comes to accessing geographically restricted content. A large number of use them interchangeably mainly because both these services can get jobs done perfectly. However, going through a complete review of NordVPN will help you understand which is better.

Proxy Server

These servers work in the form of relays between the device of the user and the site the user is visiting. In this setting, the traffic generally passes through a remote system used for connecting the user to the host server. Proxy servers work by walloping the unique IP address of the user in such a way that the site sees the proxy IP. Nevertheless, proxy servers only work on application level. This means they have the ability of re-routing traffic coming from just one application for which the user has the server for. Proxy servers also do not have the ability of encrypting traffic.

VPN or Virtual Private Network

Just like Proxy, even VPN or virtual private network carries out the task of re-routing the internet traffic of the user by way of a remote system while hiding the user’s IP address so sites will not be able to see the original location of the user. Nevertheless, VPN works on the level of operation system. This means it redirects the user’s traffic in totality regardless of whether it is come from the background applications or from the browser.

Another good thing about VPN is that it encrypts the traffic of the user between the device and the internet. This means the ISP or internet service provider monitoring the internet activity of the user and the one which is also into collecting user information is no longer able to see the activities of the users online. This is only because of the fact that the user remains connected to a certain virtual private network server. This entire encryption procedure helps in protecting the users from website tracking, government surveillance and even from hackers or snoopers trying to disturb their systems. Therefore, it can rightly be said that VPN offers the ultimate in security and online privacy to all its users.

To Conclude: Which is Better?

Considering the differences or the work procedures detailed above, it is quite likely for 99.9% users to go for VPN. VPN offers the same advantages like proxy except that you will be getting much higher levels of security, anonymity and protection. There is only one problem that comes from the use of VPN and that is VPN can be a little expensive.

However, it would be better for you to go for a proxy server only if you require a one-time service for one single activity like getting around geographical restrictions or viewing blocked sites. Going through the NordVPN official website will help you in learning more about proxy servers and VPN. One thing you should always have in mind when going for a proxy server is that you cannot send personal information on this connection. To be very specific, going for a VPN will be the best idea as it offers the same functionality as proxy but with higher levels of protection and security.…

5 Worst CPUs Ever

Previously this year we upgraded our CPU purchasing guide putting Ryzen front and center, and while that guide is due for an upgrade now that Ryzen 3 and Threadripper have  landed, those choices are still as legitimate today as they were at that time with the Ryzen 5 1600 providing the very best efficiency for your dollar for the majority of users.

Intel Core i7-6950X (Broadwell-E)

The majority of these choices will no doubt be questionable, but this one may stimulate the remarks more than others. From a technical viewpoint, the Core i7-6950X was a little a marvel. At the time of release, it was, without a doubt, the most effective desktop CPU, and it didn’t simply smash performance work but was likewise a really capable video gaming processor.

In regards to efficiency, it had no weak point; power usage was really sensible for a 10-core/20-thread CPU, and while not the very best overclocker, once again for a 10-core part, it was outstanding. Sounds excellent up until now, but the concern was the rate.

Intel Core i3-7350K

When you consider all the extra expenses, you basically wind up with a truly pricey dual-core that’s more than two times the rate of the G4560 and not a good deal quicker. Still, the Kaby Lake architecture is great, so in regards to efficiency and performance, the 7350K isn’t bad. Maybe the weakest option of the five worst CPUs, it’s still difficult to suggest this Core i3 with other much better options sitting best beside it.

Update (9/11): Just a simply after publishing this releasing, short article reviewed the latest APUMost current the A12-9800. If the timing had been much better, this processor definitely would have made this list as we can’t come up with one legitimate factor or scenario where these CPUs make an ounce of sense.

Intel Pentium 4 (Prescott)

Prescott doubled down on the P4’s already-long pipeline, extending it to almost 40 phases, while Intel concurrently diminished the P4 to a 90nm die. Prescott and its dual-core brother or sister, Smithfield, is the weakest desktop item Intel ever fielded relatively to its competitors at the time.

AMD Bulldozer

AMD’s Bulldozer was expected to take a march on Intel by skillfully sharing specific chip abilities to enhance performance and lower pass away size. Bulldozer couldn’t strike its target clocks, drew too much power, and its efficiency was a portion of what is required to be. It’s uncommon that a CPU is so bad, it almost eliminates the business that created it.

Intel Itanium

Intel’s Itanium was an extreme effort to press hardware intricacy into software application optimizations. It didn’t. Compilers were not able to draw out needed efficiency, and the chip was significantly incompatible with whatever that had come before it.